Published in Glaucoma

The Hills and Valleys of Uveitic Glaucoma

This is editorially independent content
13 min read

Uncover clinical pearls for managing inflammation, IOP, and optic nerve damage in uveitic glaucoma to preserve both vision and quality of life for patients.

The Hills and Valleys of Uveitic Glaucoma
Uveitic glaucoma consists of a complicated triad of intraocular inflammation, elevated intraocular pressure, and optic nerve damage. This is a clinical challenge that requires nuanced multidisciplinary management.
Glaucoma arises secondarily to intraocular inflammation, and this demands a great deal of attention.1 Uveitic glaucoma is present in up to 20% of patients diagnosed with chronic uveitis.2 The multifaceted etiology comprises trabecular meshwork damage and synechiae.3
Additionally, the most common treatment of uveitis, corticosteroids, may induce or further exacerbate glaucoma by elevating intraocular pressure (IOP).4 Meanwhile, even uncontrolled uveitis can lead to glaucoma due to the accumulation of inflammatory debris that contributes to the blockage of aqueous humour outflow.5
The pathophysiology is characterized by a dynamic and unpredictable clinical course of hills and valleys, marked by episodic fluctuations in inflammatory activity, IOP variability, and inconsistent therapeutic responses.
Although this condition may manifest across a broad age spectrum, it frequently presents earlier than primary open-angle glaucoma and necessitates a highly individualized management strategy.6

Signs and symptoms of uveitic glaucoma

Patients presenting with uveitic glaucoma may present with a wide range of signs and symptoms depending on both the elevation of IOP and the inflammatory extent of uveitis. One simplifying factor in the diagnosis is that usually, patients are known to have pre-existing glaucoma.
Patients with uveitic glaucoma often experience symptoms like:7
  • Pain
  • Photophobia
  • Rapidly progressive diminution of visual acuity
  • Acute visual blurring
A key concern is the potential for asymptomatic elevation of IOP, which may progress unnoticed and remain undetected in the absence of routine ophthalmic evaluation. This underscores the importance of regular monitoring, as individuals may not experience symptoms that would otherwise prompt medical attention.8

Clinical characteristics of uveitic glaucoma

Ocular hyperemia may be observed on physical examination and can be accompanied by conjunctival or ciliary injection; however, the absence of these findings does not exclude the diagnosis of uveitic glaucoma.
Furthermore, on slit lamp examination, several characteristic findings may be observed, including keratic precipitates, which are deposits of inflammatory cells on the corneal endothelium; anterior chamber “cell and flare,” reflecting the presence of inflammatory cells, and protein in the aqueous humor and indicating active intraocular inflammation.
For example:
  • Iris synechiae, which are adhesions between the iris and either the lens or cornea, develop as a result of chronic inflammation.
  • Posterior subcapsular cataracts, characterized by opacification of the posterior aspect of the lens, are often associated with prolonged inflammation or corticosteroid use.
Fundoscopic examination may reveal glaucomatous optic nerve changes, such as an increased cup-to-disc ratio or thinning of the neuroretinal rim, which are indicative of optic nerve damage secondary to elevated IOP.9
Figure 1: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis with characteristic large keratic precipitates.7
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis with characteristic large keratic precipitates.
Figure 1: Uveitic Glaucoma©Ioannis Halkiadakis et al. Image used under CC BY 4.0.

Diagnostic workup: Imaging is integral

The diagnostic evaluation for uveitic glaucoma incorporates several specialized tools and imaging modalities:10
  • Tonometry: Crucial for frequent monitoring of IOP, as pressure levels can fluctuate significantly in these patients.11
  • Gonioscopy: Performed to assess the anterior chamber angle and can help identify angle closure due to synechiae formation or accumulation of inflammatory debris.12
  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT): OCT imaging of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macula is utilized to monitor the structural integrity of the optic nerve and to detect concurrent complications such as cystoid macular edema.13

Pro Tip: Although visual field testing can be challenging during episodes of active uveitis, it remains an important tool for the longitudinal assessment and follow-up of glaucomatous damage.14

Additionally, anterior segment imaging techniques, such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) or anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT), are particularly valuable in complex or post-surgical cases.
These imaging modalities provide detailed visualization of the angle structures and can assist in identifying features such as iris bombe, where the iris bows forward due to a blockage of fluid flow within the eye, leading to pupillary block and exacerbating angle closure glaucoma.15
Figure 2: Slit lamp image of angle-closure glaucoma with iris bombe.7
Slit lamp image of angle-closure glaucoma with iris bombe.
Figure 2: Angle-Closure Glaucoma with Iris Bombe©Ioannis Halkiadakis et al. Image used under CC BY 4.0.

Potential causes of uveitic glaucoma

Several underlying conditions are commonly associated with the development of uveitic glaucoma, including:
One such condition is Fuchs’ heterochromic iridocyclitis, which is characterized by chronic, low-grade inflammation of the eye. Patients with FHI often exhibit heterochromia, a difference in coloration between the two irises, and fine stellate keratic precipitates (KPs), which are star-shaped deposits of inflammatory cells on the inner surface of the cornea. Despite the relatively mild inflammation, elevated IOP is frequently observed.16
Another cause is Posner-Schlossman syndrome, which typically presents as recurrent, unilateral episodes of markedly elevated IOP accompanied by mild inflammation. Between these episodes, patients are often asymptomatic, and the eye appears normal.17
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is also a significant contributor, particularly in pediatric populations. JIA-associated uveitis tends to be silent and chronic, meaning children may not report symptoms despite ongoing inflammation.
This can lead to the early onset of severe glaucoma, especially when the disease is complicated by the formation of synechiae and the use of corticosteroids, which themselves can increase IOP.18

Best practices for management of uveitic glaucoma

The management of uveitic glaucoma is complex, as it requires both effective control of intraocular inflammation and reduction of IOP—objectives that can sometimes conflict with each other.
Corticosteroids—which include medications administered as eye drops (topical), injections around the eye (periocular), or oral/systemic drugs—are the primary treatment for acute inflammation.19
However, corticosteroids can cause an increase in IOP, a phenomenon known as steroid-induced glaucoma, which may worsen the underlying condition. Therefore, their use must be carefully balanced, and patients should be closely monitored.

Immunomodulatory therapy

For cases where inflammation is chronic or does not respond adequately to steroids, immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) may be employed.20
IMT involves the use of systemic medications such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or adalimumab, which suppress the immune system to reduce inflammation. By lowering the need for steroids, IMT helps minimize the risk of steroid-induced IOP elevation and supports long-term IOP stability.21

IOP-lowering medications

To directly address elevated IOP, several classes of medications are available. Beta-blockers, alpha-agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are generally considered safe and effective for lowering eye pressure in patients with uveitic glaucoma.22
Prostaglandin analogs, another class of IOP-lowering drugs, are typically avoided during periods of active inflammation because they can potentially worsen intraocular inflammation.23
Rho kinase inhibitors (such as netarsudil) represent a newer class of medications that may help lower IOP, although clinical experience and data regarding their use in uveitic glaucoma are still evolving.24

Surgical therapies

Surgical therapy becomes necessary for patients whose IOP remains uncontrolled despite the use of multiple medications, or in those who develop angle closure—a condition in which the drainage angle of the eye becomes blocked, preventing fluid outflow and causing a rise in eye pressure.25
This procedure involves creating a new drainage pathway for the aqueous humor (the fluid inside the eye) to lower IOP. However, its success in uveitic glaucoma is often limited because inflammation can lead to excessive scarring, which may block the new drainage channel.
To reduce the risk of scarring, surgeons commonly use antimetabolites such as mitomycin C (MMC), which are medications that inhibit cell growth and scar formation.26
Achieving and maintaining pre-operative inflammation control is crucial to improving surgical outcomes. These are small tubes or shunts (such as the Ahmed or Baerveldt devices) that are implanted to divert aqueous humor from inside the eye to an external reservoir, thereby lowering IOP.
Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) are often preferred in cases of uveitic glaucoma, particularly in children or in patients with JIA, because their effectiveness is less dependent on the healing of the conjunctiva, which can be compromised by inflammation.
Nevertheless, it is still essential that the eye is free of active inflammation at the time of surgery to reduce complications and improve success rates.27

Laser procedures

Laser procedures can play a role in the management of uveitic glaucoma. Nd:YAG laser iridotomy is sometimes required when angle closure occurs due to the formation of posterior synechiae or a pupillary block.28 This laser treatment creates a small opening in the iris to restore normal fluid flow within the eye.
Cyclophotocoagulation is a laser procedure reserved for advanced or treatment-refractory glaucoma. It works by targeting and reducing the activity of the ciliary body, the part of the eye that produces aqueous humor, thereby lowering IOP.29 However, this procedure must be performed with caution, as it carries a risk of worsening intraocular inflammation.

To watch a narrated surgical video of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, check out Revisiting the Benefits of Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation!

Co-managing patients with uveitic glaucoma

Achieving the best outcomes for patients with uveitic glaucoma requires close collaboration between glaucoma and uveitis specialists. Several key principles guide this process. It is essential that the eye remains free of active inflammation for at least 3 months before elective glaucoma surgery, as this reduces the risk of post-operative complications.30
Steroid medications should be reduced slowly rather than stopped abruptly, since sudden withdrawal can trigger a rebound of inflammation and cause a rapid increase in intraocular pressure.31 The use of systemic immunomodulatory medications can help control both ocular and systemic inflammation, improving overall disease management.
It is vital to educate patients about the unpredictable and fluctuating nature of their disease, and to set realistic expectations regarding the need for long-term follow-up, ongoing management, and most importantly, compliance with treatment.32,33

Conclusion

Uveitic glaucoma represents a complex and evolving challenge for eyecare providers, necessitating a tailored and collaborative approach.
The unpredictable nature of both intraocular inflammation and pressure fluctuations requires ongoing vigilance, adaptability in management strategies, and close cooperation with uveitis specialists.
Clinicians must consider uveitic glaucoma in any patient who presents with elevated IOP alongside evidence of intraocular inflammation. Additionally, clinicians must monitor and manage steroid-induced IOP elevation proactively, as corticosteroids can themselves raise eye pressure.
In chronic or difficult cases, early referral for immunomodulatory therapy is recommended. Surgical intervention is frequently required to control IOP, but the likelihood of success is greatly improved if the eye is in a state of pre-operative quiescence.
Long-term, multidisciplinary co-management, involving glaucoma specialists, uveitis specialists, and the patient, is essential for preserving both vision and quality of life.
  1. Joshi K, Gupta P, Chhabra S, et al. Immune complex-positive glomerulonephritis in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive patients. J Postgrad Med Edu Res. 2017;51(4):166-169. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1257
  2. Bodh S, Kumar V, Raina U, et al. Inflammatory glaucoma. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(1):3. doi:10.4103/0974-620x.77655
  3. Yoo C, Oh JH, Kim YY, Jung HR. Peripheral anterior synechiae and ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters in Angle-Closure glaucoma suspects. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21(2):106. doi:10.3341/kjo.2007.21.2.106
  4. At a Glance: Uveitis. National Eye Institute. Published October 2, 2024. https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/uveitis.
  5. Sen S, Zeppieri M, Tripathy K. Uveitis glaucoma hyphema syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): February 29, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580530/.
  6. Rojas-Carabali W, Mejía-Salgado G, Cifuentes-González C, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of uveitic glaucoma: multicentric study in Bogotá, Colombia. Eye. 2023;38(4):714-722. doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02757-9
  7. Halkiadakis I, Konstantopoulou K, Tzimis V, et al. Update on Diagnosis and treatment of uveitic glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1185. doi:10.3390/jcm13051185
  8. Kesav N, Palestine AG, Kahook MY, Pantcheva MB. Current management of uveitis-associated ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;65(4):397-407. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.003
  9. Sherman ER, Cafiero‐chin M. Overcoming diagnostic and treatment challenges in uveitic glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;102(2):109-115. doi:10.1111/cxo.12811
  10. Diederen RM, Hulsman CA, Zegers RHC, Verbraak FD. Outcomes and complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants for the treatment of uveitis‐related glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(6). doi:10.1111/aos.13679
  11. Guner ME, Dosunmu EO, Eltzroth J, Utz VM. Home tonometry in the management of children with uveitis at risk for developing glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2022;26(4):e21-e22. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.08.080
  12. Gunay M, Uzlu D, Akyol N. Outcomes of Gonioscopy-Assisted transluminal trabeculotomy as a primary surgical treatment for glaucoma secondary to juvenile idiopathic Arthritis-Associated uveitis. Ocular Immunol Inflamm. 2023;31(10):2060-2064. doi:10.1080/09273948.2023.2221965
  13. Asrani S, Moore DB, Jaffe GJ. Paradoxical changes of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in uveitic glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(7):877. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.954
  14. Liu X, Kelly SR, Montesano G, et al. Evaluating the impact of Uveitis on visual field progression using Large-Scale Real-World data. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:144-150. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.004
  15. ZhiZhao P, Ying LH, Radke NV. UBM helps differentiate sulcus or In-the-Bag IOL placement. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. Published online September 1, 2024:100088. doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100088
  16. Esfandiari H, Loewen NA, Hassanpour K, et al. Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis-associated glaucoma: a retrospective comparison of primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. F1000Research. 2018;7:876. doi:10.12688/f1000research.15244.2
  17. Okonkwo ON, Zeppieri M, Tripathy K. Posner-Schlossman Syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): March 1, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576412/.
  18. Kotaniemi K, Sihto-Kauppi K. Occurrence and management of ocular hypertension and secondary glaucoma in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis: An observational series of 104 patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1(4):455-459.
  19. Feroze KB, Zeppieri M, Khazaeni L. Steroid-Induced glaucoma. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): July 16, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430903/.
  20. Daniel E, Thorne JE, Newcomb CW, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for ocular inflammation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;149(3):423-432.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.026
  21. Agrawal R, Goh YY, Rojas-Carabali W, et al. Immunomodulatory therapy in Non-Infectious Uveitis: Current landscape, gaps, and Future Directions. Progress Retinal Eye Res. Published online June 1, 2025:101380. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101380
  22. Kiyota N, Shiga Y, Ninomiya T, et al. The effect of Β-Blocker eye drops on pulse rate, ocular blood flow, and glaucoma progression: a retrospective longitudinal study. Adv Ther. 2024;41(2):730-743. doi:10.1007/s12325-023-02762-0
  23. Zhou L, Zhan W, Wei X. Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of prostaglandin analogues in glaucoma. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1015338. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1015338
  24. Wang J, Wang H, Dang Y. Rho-Kinase inhibitors as emerging targets for glaucoma therapy. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12(6):2943-2957. doi:10.1007/s40123-023-00820-y
  25. Carreño E, Villarón S, Portero A, et al. Surgical outcomes of uveitic glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2010;1(2):43-53. doi:10.1007/s12348-010-0012-8
  26. Ceballos EM, Beck A, Lynn MJ. Trabeculectomy with Antiproliferative Agents in Uveitic Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(3):189-196.
  27. Sinha S, Ganjei AY, McWatters Z, et al. Ahmed versus Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Device in Uveitic Glaucoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(9):750-755. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001583
  28. Gupta V, Kumar H, Mansoori T, et al. Lasers in glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(11):1539. doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_555_18
  29. Khodeiry MM, Elhusseiny AM, Liu X, Sayed MS, Lee RK. Cyclophotocoagulation as a minimally invasive treatment option for glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2023;63(4):125-135. doi:10.1097/iio.0000000000000492
  30. Magliyah MS, Badawi AH, Alshamrani AA, Malik R, Al-Dhibi H. The effect of perioperative uveitis control on the success of glaucoma surgery in uveitic glaucoma. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021;Volume 15:1465-1475. doi:10.2147/opth.s301648
  31. Phulke S, Kaushik S, Kaur S, Pandav S. Steroid-induced glaucoma: an avoidable irreversible blindness. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2017;11(2):67-72.
  32. Zaharia AC, Dumitrescu OM, Radu M, Rogoz RE. Adherence to Therapy in Glaucoma Treatment—A Review. J Pers Med. 2022;12(4):514. doi:10.3390/jpm12040514
  33. Safitri A, Konstantakopoulou E, Hu K, Gazzard G. Treatment expectations in glaucoma: what matters most to patients?. Eye. 2023;37(16):3446-3454. doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02532-w
Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed
About Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed

Marina B. Zakhary Gad El Sayed is a second-year medical student at UC Riverside, School of Medicine. Her background fuels her mission to improve healthcare access in Inland Southern California, particularly for underserved pediatric ophthalmology patients. As a medical student, she has pursued this mission through longitudinal medical education programs, research, and institutional leadership. She is an active member of PRIME LEAD-ABC, a program dedicated to advancing health equity in African, Black, and Caribbean communities.

Her research focuses on pediatric ophthalmology, concussion risks in children with visual impairment, and disparities in retinal disease outcomes. She serves as a mentor, research coordinator, and medical educator, leading initiatives that support students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Whether teaching ultrasound, advocating for policy change, or mentoring future physicians, she is dedicated to lifting others as she climbs.

Her journey to medicine is one of resilience, faith, and a deep commitment to pediatric ophthalmology, research, mentorship, and community outreach. As a Coptic Orthodox Christian and first-generation physician-in-training, her calling to medicine was shaped by both her personal experiences and my unwavering dedication to serving marginalized communities.

She was raised in Egypt for 13 years, where systemic religious discrimination was a daily reality. She learned early on what it meant to feel unheard, unseen, and undervalued. In school, harsh corporal punishment was disproportionately inflicted upon Christian students, reinforcing her fear of making even the smallest mistake. Her parents, both physicians, faced their own battles—earning half the salary of their non-Christian colleagues and working tirelessly to provide for our family. She grew up watching them practice medicine with unwavering dedication, out of a deep commitment to serving others.

In rural areas where parasitic diseases and untreated ailments ran rampant, they treated everyone—neighbors, classmates, and strangers at our local hospital—without hesitation or discrimination. Even as they faced systemic barriers in their own medical education and careers, they remained steadfast, never allowing prejudice to overshadow their purpose. It was through them that she learned medicine is not just a job but a profession rooted in service, resilience, and an unyielding devotion to humanity.

Her family's journey took a devastating turn when her father was violently attacked for simply wearing a cross. Fearing for their lives, they fled to the United States, where they faced the daunting challenge of rebuilding from nothing. In California, her parents—no longer able to practice the profession they loved and fought for—were forced to take minimum-wage jobs, and she took on the responsibility of caring for her younger siblings and teaching her parents English.

Amidst this transition, she was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus, a life-altering moment that introduced her to the complexities of navigating the healthcare system as a refugee with limited financial and language resources. She experienced firsthand what it meant to feel lost in translation, to struggle with medical decisions due to financial insecurity, and to rely on the kindness of healthcare providers who took the time to bridge those gaps.

These experiences shaped her commitment to healthcare equity, patient advocacy, and culturally competent medicine. She saw her younger self in every pediatric hospitalized patient, her parents in every immigrant patient at free clinics, and her community in every marginalized individual struggling to access care. Above all, her faith is the foundation of her journey. As a Coptic Orthodox Christian, she believes that medicine is more than a profession—it is a ministry, a way to serve others with humility, compassion, and love.

Her experiences have strengthened her belief that no patient should ever feel unheard, unseen, or left behind. Through her work in pediatric ophthalmology, research, and mentorship, she is committed to ensuring that every child, every family, and every patient she serves receives the care and dignity they deserve.

She is grateful to God for the path that He has led me on and look forward to continuing my mission after graduating, as an ophthalmologist, educator, and advocate.

Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed
Robin K. Kuriakose, MD
About Robin K. Kuriakose, MD

Dr. Robin Kuriakose is a board-certified and fellowship-trained cornea, cataract, and refractive surgeon. He completed his residency training at Loma Linda University Health in southern California and his fellowship training in Cornea and Refractive Surgery at Northwestern University in Chicago, where he was named Fellow of the Year. Dr. Kuriakose is passionate about mentorship, technology, and innovation. He has developed mobile applications and websites to aid fellow ophthalmologists as well as patients. Dr. Kuriakose is a New York native, but now practices in the Bay Area in California where he enjoys teaching local ophthalmology residents and other eye care providers.

Robin K. Kuriakose, MD
How would you rate the quality of this content?
Eyes On Eyecare Site Sponsors
Astellas Logo