Published in Cornea

Exploring Surgical Approaches for Pterygium

This is editorially independent content
12 min read

Consider advances in surgical interventions for pterygium to reduce recurrence, improve cosmetic outcomes, and provide vision-preserving results.

Closeup of an eye with a pterygium.
Pterygium excision is a commonly-performed anterior segment surgical procedure that, while often perceived as relatively straightforward, can be associated with a significant risk of recurrence and various post-operative complications.
For ophthalmologists, achieving optimal surgical outcomes requires not only meticulous technical execution but also rigorous patient education, thoughtful intra-operative planning, and tailored post-operative management strategies.
This article outlines key surgical approaches, addresses intra-operative and post-operative complexities, and provides evidence-based recommendations aimed at minimizing recurrence rates and maximizing patient satisfaction.

Overview of pterygium

A pterygium is a wing-shaped fibrovascular proliferation of conjunctival tissue that invades the corneal surface, most frequently arising from the nasal limbus.1 It is considered a degenerative and proliferative disorder of the ocular surface, and its etiopathogenesis is multifactorial.2
Figure 1: Graded according to the Johnston, Williams, and Sheppard classification system, Grade III (A) and Grade IV (B) pterygium.3
Graded according to the Johnston, Williams, and Sheppard classification system, Grade III (A) and Grade IV (B) pterygium.
Figure 1: Pterygium. ©Sara I Van Acker, et al. Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Risk factors for pterygium

Chronic ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, alcohol use, and older age are some of the most strongly implicated risk factors, promoting limbal stem cell dysfunction and fibroblast activation.3
Clinically, pterygia are often asymptomatic in their early stages; however, progression can lead to ocular discomfort, chronic hyperemia, induced astigmatism, and eventual invasion of the visual axis, thereby compromising visual acuity.4

Surgical planning: Tailoring the technique to the patient

Pterygium removal is typically indicated for chronic irritation and inflammation, or visual impairment due to corneal encroachment.5 Despite the routine nature of the procedure, several operative and post-operative challenges persist.
Firstly, pterygia can have recurrence rates that are quite high, especially when using the traditional bare sclera technique, which can range from 38% to over 80% in some series.6,7 In contrast, techniques utilizing conjunctival autograft possibly with adjuvant therapies such as Mitomycin C (MMC) remain the gold standard of care, having the lowest recurrence rates of all available treatment techniques, at about 6 to 9% without MMC, and 3 to 4% with MMC. 8,9,10
Circles with recurrence rates in pterygium surgery, such as 38-80% with the bare sclera technique, 6-9% with conjunctival autograft without MMC and 3-4% in conjunctival autograft with MMC.

Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT)

However, when specific unique surgical considerations must be considered for high-risk patients, the amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) technique has nearly comparable outcomes with the corneal autograft technique.11,12
The benefit of using this technique instead of the conjunctival autograft technique is that it preserves the patient’s native conjunctiva in anticipation of future procedures.

AMT in glaucoma and cataract patients

In particular, high-risk glaucoma patients who require acute intervention for pterygium may benefit from having an intact superior or inferonasal conjunctiva, in anticipation of the potential need for insertion of glaucoma drainage devices.13,14
Therefore, performing a conjunctival autograft in these areas can reduce the available surface for future glaucoma surgeries and increase the risk of implant failure or scarring. In such cases, using an amniotic membrane transplant instead may offer a strategic advantage, with the amniotic membrane becoming a scaffold for healing and inflammation control while sparing the patient’s native conjunctiva for future surgical access.
Furthermore, in patients with coexisting cataracts, the timing of pterygium excision can directly impact refractive outcomes.15 Large or nasally extending pterygia, especially those encroaching on the visual axis or pupillary zone, can induce irregular astigmatism and distort keratometry readings.
If cataract surgery is performed without addressing the pterygium first, intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations may be inaccurate, leading to unexpected post-operative refractive errors.16 To ensure precise biometry measurements, it is often advisable to remove the pterygium first and wait 2 to 3 months for the corneal curvature to stabilize before repeating pre-cataract measurements.
This approach not only improves visual quality post-operatively but also enhances patient satisfaction by reducing the risk of residual refractive error.17

Using Mitomycin C to mitigate recurrence

Additionally, intra-operative use of MMC, at concentrations of 0.02 to 0.04% for limited durations, further reduces recurrence in aggressive or recurrent pterygia, but carries risks of sight-threatening complications, such as scleral melt and delayed healing.18,19 Thus, it should be reserved for select cases, and the site of MMC application should be irrigated thoroughly following its use.
Figure 2: Scleral melt (5 x 3mm) involving almost the full thickness of the sclera (A) following pterygium excision with the bare sclera technique and application of MMC. An amniotic membrane graft was placed over the entire area of pterygium excision (B), and topical and systemic steroids, along with topical antibiotics and lubricants, were prescribed. The scleral graft was healthy at the 1-month follow-up (C), and the scleral surface was completely healed by 6 months (D).
Scleral melt (5 x 3mm) involving almost the full thickness of the sclera (A) following pterygium excision with the bare sclera technique and application of MMC.
Figure 2: Scleral melt©Akhil Bevara et al. Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Recently, innovations such as the PERFECT technique (extended pterygium excision with a large autograft) have been reported to have near-zero recurrence in expert hands, though operative time and required expertise often limit widespread adoption.20,21

Special considerations in planning pterygium surgery

Circles listing special considerations in planning pterygium surgery, such as ocular surface disease, systemic autoimmune or inflammatory conditions, previous ocular surgeries, and pediatric patients.
Surgeons must plan accordingly to anticipate procedures or complications that may arise from their patients’ respective comorbidities.
Patients who require special consideration include individuals with:
  • Ocular surface disease (OSD)
  • Systemic autoimmune or inflammatory conditions
  • Previous ocular surgeries
  • Pediatric classification

OSD

In patients with ocular surface disease, such as severe dry eye, meibomian gland dysfunction, or ocular rosacea, these underlying diseases should be addressed pre-operatively and post-operatively to help reduce recurrence and optimize surgical healing.
In this group of patients, some have advocated for AMT for its anti-inflammatory properties and promotion of epithelial regeneration.22

Systemic diseases

Moreover, in those with systemic autoimmune or inflammatory conditions, coordination with rheumatology, aggressive pre-operative disease control, and avoidance of bare sclera excision are essential to limit post-operative inflammation and scarring, as it has been implicated previously in the literature, both mechanistically and in post-operative infection resulting in flare-ups of chronic autoimmune disease.23,24,25

Prior ocular surgery

Patients with previous ocular surgery may limit available conjunctiva for grafting, necessitating alternative strategies such as rotation flaps, nasal autografts, or AMT, while careful imaging or mapping of the conjunctival surface can optimize surgical planning.26,27
In cases of double-headed pterygium—arising from both nasal and temporal sides—a conjunctival autograft from the surgical eye may be combined with AMT or contralateral conjunctival autograft to ensure adequate coverage.
This author favors completing the nasal pterygium first with a conjunctival autograft and waiting 1 year to allow for a re-harvest of the superior conjunctiva for the future temporal pterygium removal.
Figure 2: Double-headed pterygia with hair-like extension growth.
Double-headed pterygia with hair-like extension growth.
Figure 2: Bilateral pterygia©Tarek Roshdy Elhamaky et al. Used under CC BY 4.0.

Pediatric and elderly patients

In pediatric or young adult patients who have particularly aggressive forms of the disease, conjunctival autograft, often with MMC, balances a low recurrence rate and safety when combined with strict UV avoidance post-operatively.28,29
For frail elderly or medically complex individuals, shorter surgical times and low-manipulation techniques, such as fibrin glue-assisted graft fixation (as opposed to suture fixation), can minimize peri-operative morbidity while maintaining good outcomes.30

Post-operative care

Post-operatively, topical steroids, such as prednisolone acetate 1%, are often used to manage inflammation, and practice patterns on duration vary widely. It is important to not taper steroids too early (i.e., 1 week), but maintain them for at least 4 weeks and sometimes even as long as 3 months to help reduce the chance of early recurrence.31
Of course, this also requires careful monitoring and balancing of the patient’s other ocular conditions (cataracts, intraocular pressure, etc.). Finally, patient education on strict sun protection, particularly in those with high occupational UV exposure, is crucial in conjunction with appropriate surgical management to reduce recurrence and optimize long-term results.

Key takeaways 

Key takeaways from contemporary pterygium management emphasize the importance of tailoring surgical technique to optimize outcomes.
  1. Conjunctival autografting remains the gold standard, offering the best combination of safety, efficacy, and the lowest recurrence rates.
  2. The use of fibrin glue has been shown to improve the patient experience by decreasing post-operative discomfort and ocular surface inflammation.
  3. In cases where conjunctival tissue is insufficient, such as in eyes with prior surgeries or advanced scarring, amniotic membrane transplantation serves as a suitable alternative due to its anti-inflammatory and healing properties.
  4. Mitomycin C, while effective in reducing recurrence, must be employed selectively with close post-operative monitoring to avoid serious complications such as scleral thinning or delayed healing.
  5. Finally, educating patients on diligent UV protection and ocular surface management following surgery is critical to reducing recurrence rates and promoting long-term ocular surface stability.

In conclusion

Pterygium surgery continues to evolve. Being one of the most widely performed ocular surface procedures, it offers a range of techniques that can be tailored to individual patients based on their respective risk factor profiles.
While the bare sclera technique is now largely considered historic due to high peri-operative risks, and risks of pterygium recurrence, approaches such as conjunctival autografting and amniotic membrane transplantation (with consideration of Mitomycin C) remain the most widely utilized.
Each technique carries distinct advantages and limitations, and careful planning, including attention to patient comorbidities, ocular surface health, and future surgical needs, is necessary to optimize long-term outcomes.
Ultimately, the success of pterygium surgery rests on meticulous surgical technique, thoughtful patient education, shared decision-making, and proactive post-operative care. By integrating these principles, ophthalmologists can reduce pterygium recurrence, improve cosmetic outcomes, and provide patients with durable, vision-preserving results.
  1. Sarkar P, Tripathy K. Pterygium. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; August 25, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558907/.
  2. Coroneo MT, Chui JJY. Pterygium. Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Lee WB, eds. In: Ocular Surface Disease: Cornea, Conjunctiva and Tear Film. Elsevier; 2013:125-144.
  3. Van Acker SI, Van den Bogerd B, Haagdorens M, et al. Pterygium—The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Cells. 2021; 10(7):1567. doi:10.3390/cells10071567
  4. Yoon CH, Seol BR, Choi HJ. Effect of pterygium on corneal astigmatism, irregularity and higher-order aberrations: a comparative study with normal fellow eyes. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34466-4
  5. Alfarhan A, Alhamzah A, Abuabat A, et al. Surgical Preferences in the Management of Primary Pterygium among Anterior Segment Specialists. The Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2021;15(1):322-328. doi:10.2174/1874364102115010322
  6. Oke I, Elze T, Miller JW, et al. The prevalence and recurrence risk of bare sclera pterygium surgery in the United States. The Ocular Surface. 2023;29:547-549. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2023.05.006
  7. Govindasamy S, Chandrasekhar SCR. Outcome of Excision of Primary Pterygium with Bare Sclera Technique: A Study of 80 Eyes in Malaysia. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2022;4(4):17-20. doi:10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.4.1379
  8. Li W, Lou Y, Wang B. Recurrence rate with inferior conjunctival autograft transplantation compared with superior conjunctival autograft transplantation in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmology. 2021;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12886-021-01889-4
  9. Röck T, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck D. A retrospective study to compare the recurrence rate after treatment of pterygium by conjunctival autograft, primary closure, and amniotic membrane transplantation. Medical Science Monitor. 2019;25:7976-7981. doi:10.12659/msm.915629
  10. Martins TGDS, De Azevedo Costa ALF, Alves MR, et al. Mitomycin C in pterygium treatment. International Journal of Ophthalmology. Published online March 14, 2016. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.03.25
  11. Noureddin G, Yeung S. The use of dry amniotic membrane in pterygium surgery. Clinical Ophthalmology. Published online April 1, 2016:705. doi:10.2147/opth.s80102
  12. Kashfi SA, Razmjoo H, Mirmohammadkhani M, Pourazizi M. Recurrence rate and clinical outcome of amniotic membrane transplantation combined with mitomycin c in pterygium surgery: Two-year follow-up. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice. 2020;9(1):10. doi:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_19_127
  13. Thakur S, Ichhpujani P, Kumar S. Grafts in Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. Published online January 1, 2017. doi:10.22608/apo.2016123
  14. Gupta S, Jeria S. A Review on Glaucoma Drainage Devices and its Complications. Cureus. Published online September 12, 2022. doi:10.7759/cureus.29072
  15. Sharma B, Bajoria SK, Mishra M, Iqubal N. Refractive outcomes of simultaneous pterygium and cataract surgery with fibrin glue. Cureus. Published online November 24, 2021. doi:10.7759/cureus.19857
  16. Rad NR. Treatment of Pterygium on the refractive errors: A Systematic Review. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025;39(3):269-287. doi:10.3341/kjo.2025.0003
  17. Niruthisard D, Tulvatana W, Satitpitakul V. Time to Keratometric Stability After Pterygium excision and the Associated factors: A Clinical perspective. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021;Volume 15:1277-1283. doi:10.2147/opth.s303936
  18. Avisar R, Gaton DD, Loya N, et al. Intraoperative mitomycin C 0.02% for pterygium. Cornea. 2003;22(2):102-104. doi:10.1097/00003226-200303000-00003
  19. Ang LP, Chua JL, Tan DT. Current concepts and techniques in pterygium treatment. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2007;18(4):308-313. doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e3281a7ecbb
  20. Nuzzi R, Tridico F. How to minimize pterygium recurrence rates: clinical perspectives. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2018;12:2347-2362. doi:10.2147/opth.s186543
  21. Atima MO, Pam DJ. Pterygium conjunctival autograft. Journal of the Nigerian Academy of Medicine. 2022;1(2):59-64. doi:10.4103/jnam.jnam_9_21
  22. Wanzeler ACV, Barbosa IAF, Duarte B, Barbosa EB, Borges DA, Alves M. Impact of pterygium on the ocular surface and meibomian glands. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0213956. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213956
  23. Balci M, Şahin Ş, Mutlu FM, et al. Investigation of oxidative stress in pterygium tissue. Molecular Vision. 2011;17:443-447.
  24. Liu Y, Chen H, Cui H. Key Genes of Immunity Associated with Pterygium and Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(3):2047. doi:10.3390/ijms24032047
  25. Su CY, Tsai JJ, Chang YC, Lin CP. Immunologic and clinical manifestations of infectious scleritis after pterygium excision. Cornea. 2006;25(6):663-666. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000214228.44109.0f
  26. Sheha H, Tseng SCG. Surgeons explore ways to manage recurrent pterygium. Healio. March 1, 2013. https://www.healio.com/news/ophthalmology/20130309/10_3928_1081_597x_20130101_04_1061368#:~:text=MMC%20application,in%20between%20to%20cause%20recurrence.
  27. Lopez G, Sayegh RR. Pterygium excision after LASIK. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. 2020;18:100649. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100649
  28. Anguria P, Ntuli S, Carmichael T. Young patient’s age determines pterygium recurrence after surgery. African Health Sciences. 2014;14(1):72. doi:10.4314/ahs.v14i1.11
  29. Küçük E. Tear film functions and dry eye symptoms in young patients with pterygium. Beyoglu Eye Journal. Published online January 1, 2019. doi:10.14744/bej.2019.18853
  30. Jiao W, Zhou C, Wang T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pterygium in rural older adults in Shandong Province of China: a Cross-Sectional study. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:1-8. doi:10.1155/2014/658648
  31. Hashemi A, Aghamirsalim M, Hashemi H, Malekifar P, Khabazkhoob M. Prevalence of pterygium and pinguecula and their risk factors: Tehran Geriatric Eye Study. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025;18(4):699-706. doi:10.18240/ijo.2025.04.17
Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed
About Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed

Marina B. Zakhary Gad El Sayed is a second-year medical student at UC Riverside, School of Medicine. Her background fuels her mission to improve healthcare access in Inland Southern California, particularly for underserved pediatric ophthalmology patients. As a medical student, she has pursued this mission through longitudinal medical education programs, research, and institutional leadership. She is an active member of PRIME LEAD-ABC, a program dedicated to advancing health equity in African, Black, and Caribbean communities.

Her research focuses on pediatric ophthalmology, concussion risks in children with visual impairment, and disparities in retinal disease outcomes. She serves as a mentor, research coordinator, and medical educator, leading initiatives that support students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Whether teaching ultrasound, advocating for policy change, or mentoring future physicians, she is dedicated to lifting others as she climbs.

Her journey to medicine is one of resilience, faith, and a deep commitment to pediatric ophthalmology, research, mentorship, and community outreach. As a Coptic Orthodox Christian and first-generation physician-in-training, her calling to medicine was shaped by both her personal experiences and my unwavering dedication to serving marginalized communities.

She was raised in Egypt for 13 years, where systemic religious discrimination was a daily reality. She learned early on what it meant to feel unheard, unseen, and undervalued. In school, harsh corporal punishment was disproportionately inflicted upon Christian students, reinforcing her fear of making even the smallest mistake. Her parents, both physicians, faced their own battles—earning half the salary of their non-Christian colleagues and working tirelessly to provide for our family. She grew up watching them practice medicine with unwavering dedication, out of a deep commitment to serving others.

In rural areas where parasitic diseases and untreated ailments ran rampant, they treated everyone—neighbors, classmates, and strangers at our local hospital—without hesitation or discrimination. Even as they faced systemic barriers in their own medical education and careers, they remained steadfast, never allowing prejudice to overshadow their purpose. It was through them that she learned medicine is not just a job but a profession rooted in service, resilience, and an unyielding devotion to humanity.

Her family's journey took a devastating turn when her father was violently attacked for simply wearing a cross. Fearing for their lives, they fled to the United States, where they faced the daunting challenge of rebuilding from nothing. In California, her parents—no longer able to practice the profession they loved and fought for—were forced to take minimum-wage jobs, and she took on the responsibility of caring for her younger siblings and teaching her parents English.

Amidst this transition, she was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus, a life-altering moment that introduced her to the complexities of navigating the healthcare system as a refugee with limited financial and language resources. She experienced firsthand what it meant to feel lost in translation, to struggle with medical decisions due to financial insecurity, and to rely on the kindness of healthcare providers who took the time to bridge those gaps.

These experiences shaped her commitment to healthcare equity, patient advocacy, and culturally competent medicine. She saw her younger self in every pediatric hospitalized patient, her parents in every immigrant patient at free clinics, and her community in every marginalized individual struggling to access care. Above all, her faith is the foundation of her journey. As a Coptic Orthodox Christian, she believes that medicine is more than a profession—it is a ministry, a way to serve others with humility, compassion, and love.

Her experiences have strengthened her belief that no patient should ever feel unheard, unseen, or left behind. Through her work in pediatric ophthalmology, research, and mentorship, she is committed to ensuring that every child, every family, and every patient she serves receives the care and dignity they deserve.

She is grateful to God for the path that He has led me on and look forward to continuing my mission after graduating, as an ophthalmologist, educator, and advocate.

Marina Zahkary Gad El Sayed
Robin K. Kuriakose, MD
About Robin K. Kuriakose, MD

Dr. Robin Kuriakose is a board-certified and fellowship-trained cornea, cataract, and refractive surgeon. He completed his residency training at Loma Linda University Health in southern California and his fellowship training in Cornea and Refractive Surgery at Northwestern University in Chicago, where he was named Fellow of the Year. Dr. Kuriakose is passionate about mentorship, technology, and innovation. He has developed mobile applications and websites to aid fellow ophthalmologists as well as patients. Dr. Kuriakose is a New York native, but now practices in the Bay Area in California where he enjoys teaching local ophthalmology residents and other eye care providers.

Robin K. Kuriakose, MD
How would you rate the quality of this content?
Eyes On Eyecare Site Sponsors
Astellas Logo